Legal Opinion

State v. Rogers

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 4, 1989No. 571A87PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

In his first assignment of error, the defendant contends that the trial court erred in overruling the defendant’s objections to numerous comments the prosecutor made in his closing argument. The defendant argues that by the following comments, the prosecutor injected his personal beliefs into the trial:

First of all, the very basic notion that Transylvania County should be a clean and a decent, and a safe and a law abiding—

Let me tell you right off the bat, that I do not believe in, and I do not countenance this drug business, possession . . . of drugs, or use of drugs, by anyone—

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. BondurantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. FlemingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. FlemingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. MisenheimerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. OlsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. State v. RoacheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  4. State v. WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. State v. HolderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API