Legal Opinion

Stout v. Illinois Farmers Insurance

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided March 24, 1994No. NA 92-16 CPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ENTRY

BARKER, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s objection to the Magistrate Judge’s entry on plaintiffs motion to compel and defendant’s motion for protective order. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the Magistrate Judge’s order.

The relevant entry of the Magistrate Judge is published at Stout v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co., 150 F.R.D. 594 (S.D.Ind. 1993). The pertinent facts and case history are set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s entry (the “Entry”).

I. Punitive Damages Claim

There was some confusion as of the time of the Entry as to: 1) whether…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Erie Insurance v. Hickman Ex Rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Janicker v. George Washington UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  3. Stout v. Illinois Farmers InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1993

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. United Hospital Center, Inc. v. BedellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In re the Leslie Fay Companies, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  3. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  4. Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  5. Moe v. System Transport, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API