Legal Opinion

Carlisle v. Allen

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 2010No. 2007-CT-02047-SCTPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI

PIERCE, Justice,

for the court:

¶ 1. A divorced couple, Charles Allen and Janet Allen, filed a petition to revoke their divorce. While the petition was pending, Charles died. The chancellor initially quashed the motion. On rehearing, the chancellor found that Janet had produced sufficient evidence of reconciliation and entered an order revoking the divorce. Arthur Carlisle, the administrator of Charles’s estate, appealed on his behalf. The Court of Appeals — finding cases in which a party to a pending divorce died prior to a final entry of divorce to be analogous — held…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Albright v. AlbrightMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Cummings v. BendermanMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  4. H & W TRANSFER & CARTAGE SERV. v. GriffinMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Mississippi Ethics Commission v. GrishamMississippi Supreme Court · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Southern Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Lloyd's of LondonMississippi Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Faul ex rel. A.F. v. PerlmanCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2012
  3. Morrow v. MorrowMississippi Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Curtis v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2011
  5. Entergy Mississippi, Inc. v. RichardsonMississippi Supreme Court · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API