Legal Opinion

Entergy Mississippi, Inc. v. Richardson

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2014No. 2012-IA-01686-SCTPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHANDLER, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. This is a direct appeal from the Hinds County Circuit Court. The trial *289court granted plaintiff Karen Richardson’s motion to reinstate a negligence action arising out of a 2001 automobile accident involving a truck owned by defendant En-tergy Mississippi, Inc., (“Entergy”). Richardson’s action had been dismissed for failure to prosecute. We find that the trial court erred in granting the motion to reinstate. While the statute of limitations did not operate to preclude an evaluation of the merits for equitable relief under Mississippi Rule of Civil Procedure…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Community Dental Services, Dba Smilecare Dental Group v. Stuart Tani, DdsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Stringfellow v. StringfellowMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Meiboom v. WatsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Bruce v. BruceMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Cox v. CoxMississippi Supreme Court · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. William W. Satterfield v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2015
  2. Kay Thornhill v. Christopher W. IngramMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API