Legal Opinion
Bonjorno v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 9, 1989No. Nos. 88-1318, 88-1396PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
COWEN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal arises from an order of the district court granting plaintiff’s motion for post-judgment interest. Upon review, we conclude that the district court erred with respect to some aspects of its application of the relevant statute. We will affirm the district court’s determination of the date from which interest runs. We will reverse the district court’s grant of post-judgment interest in the amount of $2,632,-886.30 because it incorrectly determined that the applicable rate under the post-judgment interest statute is Pennsylvania’s six-percent…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Darr v. MuratoraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Barry Clifford v. M/v Islander and Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket Steamship AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1991
- Thomas v. FrankDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Kimble v. DPCE, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.