Tucker v. Royal Ins. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
This suit is to recover on a fire insurance policy. Upon conclusion of the evidence the court gave for defendant the general affirmative charge, and plaintiffs appeal.
Among other defenses interposed, the defendant company pleaded (plea 5) a forfeiture of the policy for a breach of the following provision therein contained: “The entire policy * * * shall be void * * * if any change, other than by the death of the insured, take place in the interest, title or possession of the subject of insurance (except change of occupancy without increase of hazard) whether by legal process or- judgment, or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Loventhal v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- North River Insurance v. WaddellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Brighton Beach Racing Ass'n v. Home InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Widincamp v. Phenix InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Schloss v. Westchester Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Collins v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. DeasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Providence Washington Insurance v. PassCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940