Legal Opinion · Dissent

Providence Washington Insurance v. Pass

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 5, 1940No. 28405Published

1DissentBroyles, C. J.

I can not agree with the majority opinion. Generally speaking, an executory contract of sale entered into by the insured, not consummated before loss, is not a breach of the condition that the interest of the insured shall remain sole and unconditional. 26 C. J. 233. “But where the executory vendee has deviated from the usual practice and has, in addition to his executory contract, and pending its fulfilment, taken actual possession and control of the property, by the better authority the policy is held avoided.” Richards on the Law of Insurance, 385, § 245; Brighton Beach Racing Asso. v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Libby Lumber Co. v. Pacific States Fire InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Wells v. Fay & Egan Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  3. Continental Ins. Co. v. MichaelsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Cardwell v. Virginia State InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Watts v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API