Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Narveson v. Village of McIntosh

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 16, 1905No. Nos. 14,431—(195)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Writ of certiorari issued from the district court for Polk- county upon relation of Ole O. Narveson, to review the action of the canvassing board of defendant village at an election at which was submitted the question of issuing liquor licenses. From an order, Watts, J., discharging the writ, relator appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtJaggard, J.

At the annual election held in the village of, McIntosh on March 14. 1905, the question whether liquor licenses should or should not be issued in that village was submitted to its voters. At the close of the polls the election judges counted the ballots, and made and filed their return with the village recorder, determining that a majority of the votes cast at such election was against the granting of licenses. The relator and appellant applied to the district court of Polk county for a writ of certiorari to review that decision of the election judges. The writ was allowed and issued. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morgan v. QuackenbushNew York Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Moede v. County of StearnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Champion v. Board of County Commissioners of Minnehaha CountySupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1889
  4. State ex rel. Hardy v. CloughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. State ex rel. Thompson v. Common CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Phillips v. EricsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Lehigh Sewer Pipe & Tile Co. v. Incorporated Town of LehighSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  3. Farrell v. School District No. 54, Lincoln CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Johnson v. Du BoisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  5. State ex rel. Nelson v. EmersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API