Legal Opinion

Bramberg v. Jones

California Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1999No. S076784PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, C. J.

Petitioners—a taxpayer and registered voter, a prospective candidate for public office, and two elected public officials—filed this original writ proceeding in this court on February 25, 1999, challenging the constitutional validity of Proposition 225, an initiative measure relating to congressional term limits that was narrowly adopted by the electorate at the June 2, 1998, Primary Election. Among other provisions, Proposition 225 “instruct[s]” elected federal and state legislators to propose and support a specific congressional term limits amendment to the United States…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. U. S. Term Limits, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Leser v. GarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Hawke v. Smith (No. 1)Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Donovan v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cook v. GralikeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Independent Energy Producers Association v. McPhersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. PadillaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Donald James Gralike, Mike Harman, Intervenor on Appeal,. v. Rebecca McDowell Cook, Professor Kris W. Kobach, Amicus on Behalf of League of Women Voters of the United States League of Women Voters of Missouri, Amici on Behalf OfCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  5. Cook v. GralikeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API