Legal Opinion

United States v. Kesterson

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided November 8, 1934No. 7887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge.

An indictment was returned into this court, charging the defendants with possession of whisky for sale as retail liquor dealers, within the jurisdiction of this court, without having paid the special excise tax of $1,000, in violation of section 206, title 26 USCA. The defendants have demurred to the indictment, challenging the constitutionality of the act of Congress, as set forth in section 206," supra, because it violates the provisions of article 1, § 8, el. 1, of the Constitution of the United Stqtes, which reads as follows: “Section 8. The Congress…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Knowlton v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Poe v. SeabornSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Edye v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. KestersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Senate Club, Inc. v. VileyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1935
  3. Kesterson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API