United States v. Kesterson
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts
This case, like the case next preceding, involves the validity of § 701 of the Revenue Act of 1926. The Circuit Court of Appeals reversed judgments of conviction under an indictment charging engaging in the business of a retail liquor dealer contrary to the laws of Oklahoma on August 17, 1934. 8 F. Supp. 680; 76 F. (2d) 913.
For the reasons given in the opinion in the other case the judgment is Affirmed.
Mr. Justice Brandéis, Mr. Justice Stone and Mr. Justice Cardozo dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice Cardozo’s opinion in United States v. Constantine, ante, p. 287.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. KestersonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1934
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. IannielloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- United States v. IannielloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Scott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936