Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Williams

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided October 24, 1989No. 88-1185PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OXBERGER, Chief Judge.

Appellant/cross-appellee Joan L. Williams and appellee/cross-appellant Carl M. Williams appeal from a dissolution decree, challenging economic provisions. Joan also requests attorney's fees on appeal. We affirm as modified.

In this equity action, our scope of review is de novo. Iowa R.App.P. 4. Our duty is to review the entire record and determine rights anew from the credible evidence on issues properly presented and preserved. In re Marriage of Steenhoek, 305 N.W.2d 448, 452 (Iowa 1981). We give weight to the fact findings of the trial court but are not bound by them.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of SteenhoekSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. In Re the Marriage of WeidnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  3. In Re the Marriage of CastleCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1981
  4. In Re the Marriage of HitchcockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  5. In Re the Marriage of KernCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of WillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  2. In Re the Marriage of OlerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1989
  3. In Re the Marriage of BensonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  4. In Re the Marriage of BensonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  5. In re the Marriage of HansenCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API