King v. Boettcher
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FLAHERTY, Justice.
The issue presented by this case is whether the Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss Fund (the “CAT Fund”) created by the Health Care Services Malpractice Act, 40 P.S. § 1301.101 et. seq. (“the Act”), is liable for post-judgment interest when it fails to pay a judgment awarded against it when the judgment is due.
*576In the underlying medical malpractice action, Boettcher brought a wrongful death and a survival action against Dr. Robert L. King (“the doctor”) for the death of Boettcher’s wife, which occurred in the course of medical treatment…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tominello v. JanewaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
3Cited by9 opinions
- Willet v. Pennsylvania Medical Catastrophe Loss FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Mulligan v. PiczonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Mulligan v. PiczonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Montgomery Hospital v. Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss FundCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Montgomery Hospital v. Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss FundCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.