Legal Opinion

Mulligan v. Piczon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 7, 2001No. Appeal 53 MAP 2000PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

The Court being evenly divided, the Order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed.

Justice ZAPPALA files an Opinion in Support of Reversal in which Chief Justice FLAHERTY and Justice NIGRO join. Justice SAYLOR files an Opinion in Support of Affirmance in which Justice CAPPY and CASTILLE join. Justice NIGRO files an Opinion in Support of Reversal. Justice NEWMAN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

OPINION IN SUPPORT OF REVERSAL

ZAPPALA, Justice.

This is an appeal by the Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss Fund (CAT Fund) from the Commonwealth Court’s…

3Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Howat v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Muhammad v. Strassburger, McKenna, Messer, Shilobod & GutnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. In Re MartoranoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BowdenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. West Pittston Borough v. LIW Investments, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Commonwealth v. HonoreCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Korczakowski v. Hwan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2004
  5. BERNARD v. IGNELZIDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API