Legal Opinion

Mulligan v. Piczon

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 3, 1999PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGINLEY, J.

The Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss Fund (CAT Fund), 1 appeals from an order of the Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas (trial court) that fined the CAT Fund one dollar per day for each day that a designated representative of the agency did not attend the trial in the matter of Mulligan v. Piczon, et al., 95 Civil 1039, as of March 15, 1999.

This controversy arose during the trial of a medical malpractice action commenced against Dr. Piczon (Piczon) and the Community Medical Center (Medical Center) for alleged negligence in the performance of orthopedic surgery. Piczon and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Willet v. Pennsylvania Medical Catastrophe Loss FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. In the Matter of Charles LamarreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  4. Fenstamaker v. FenstamakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Schifano v. SchifanoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Smeal Fire Apparatus Co. v. KreikemeierNebraska Supreme Court · 2010
  2. West Pittston Borough v. LIW Investments, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Commonwealth v. HonoreCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Korczakowski v. Hwan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2004
  5. BERNARD v. IGNELZIDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API