Legal Opinion

Yoeckel v. Samonig

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1956PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGehl, J.

The parties agree that plaintiff seeks to plead a cause of action based upon defendant’s violation of her right of privacy, sometimes defined as the right to be let alone. As appears from the annotations in 138 A. L. R. 22, and in 168 A. L. R. 446, the right has been recognized and enforced in some jurisdictions and denied in others. In the only cases in which this court has been called upon to consider the question we refused to recognize the right. In Judevine v. Benzies-Montanye Fuel & Whse. Co. (1936), 222 Wis. 512, 527, 269 N. W. 295, recovery was sought on that ground among others. It…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Judevine v. Benzies-Montanye Fuel & Warehouse Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Brunson v. Ranks Army StoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State Ex Rel. Distenfeld v. NeelenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Slawek v. StrohWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Estate of Berthiaume v. PRATT, MDSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  3. Ross v. EbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Hirsch v. S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Meier v. MeurerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API