State v. Woodmansee
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtBarney, J.
The respondent was brought to trial on a five count information. In the middle of the fifth day of a six day trial, near the close of the State’s case, the prosecutor moved to nol pros counts two and five, and to amend count three, of the information. These motions were granted over the strenuous objections of the respondent, and his motion for directed verdicts of acquittal on the nol prossed counts two and five was denied. The trial then proceeded, and at the close of the State’s case the respondent moved for directed verdicts of acquittal on the remaining counts one, three and four. Upon…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bellows Falls Village Corp. v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
- Donoghue v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1956
- Powers v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
- State v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
- State v. HurleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Robert Dale Gray v. Robert RainesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- State v. NeisnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- State v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
- State v. ChristmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.