Legal Opinion

Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Bowen

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 3, 1923No. 14685PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. “A correct statement of law embraced in a charge to the jury is not erroneous because the court failed in the same connection to give to the jury other appropriate instructions. Lucas v. State, 110 Ga. 756 (36 S. E. 87); Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Grady, 113 Ga. 1045 (3), 1046 (39 S. E. 441); Keys v. State, 112 Ga. 392 (4), 397 (37 S. E. 762, 81 Am. St. R. 63); Rawlins v. State, 124 Ga. 31 (16), 50 (52 S. E. 1).” Hill v. State, 18 Ga. App. 259 (98 S. E. 351). See also Nail v. State, 125 Ga. 234 (2) (54 S. E. 145); Killian v. State, 19, Ga. App. 750 (2) (92 S. E. 227); Barron v. State, 12…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rawlins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Keys v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Lucas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Barron v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  5. Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. DumasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  2. Brown v. Mayor of AthensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  3. Simmons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  4. Delk v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API