Legal Opinion
Bromberg v. First Nat. Bank of Mobile
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided December 16, 1937No. 1 Div. 975PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The pleading of First National Bank was interpleader. Adverse interest was supported and all parties were duly represented.
The case was tried upon amended pleadings, was so decided by the circuit court of Mobile county, Ala., in equity, and will be likewise considered here. Thomas, Supt. of Banks, et al. v. Barnes et al., 219 Ala. 652, 123 So. 18, and Federal Automobile Insurance Ass’n et al. v. Meyers, 218 Ala. 520, 119 So. 230.
The pleading of the First National Bank, as the personal representative of the estate of Frederick G. Bromberg, sought directions as to the…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Robb v. VosSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Fretwell v. McLemoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Ivy v. HoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Ussery v. DarrowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Esslinger v. SpraginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Russell v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Lavretta v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Pittman v. PittmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.