Pittman v. Pittman
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Justice.
Bill in equity to cancel a deed to defendant, James Foster Pittman (appellant), as a cloud on complainants’ title.
General demurrers were interposed .assigning laches, the statute of limitations .and prescription, the permissible practice if such appears from the face of the bill. Ussery v. Darrow, 238 Ala. 67, 188 So. 885; Lewis v. Belk, 219 Ala. 343, 122 So. 413. This appeal is from the decree overruling the demurrers.
The salient facts presented by the bill will appear in the report of the case but, boiled down, the bill makes a clear showing that pending negotiations…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Prutsman v. BakerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Oxford v. EstesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Fowler v. Alabama Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Van Antwerp v. Van AntwerpSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Haney v. LeggSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Duncan v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Spradling v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- McKinstry v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Wise v. HelmsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Williams v. Mobile Oil Exploration Prod. S.E.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.