Koenig v. City of South Haven
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs appeal as of right from the trial court’s order granting defendant City of South Haven’s motion for summary disposition. Plaintiffs also appeal from the judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict finding no cause of action in favor of the individual defendants. Plaintiffs argue that the trial court erred in excluding certain testimony from lay and expert witnesses. Finally, plaintiffs contend that the trial court erred in failing to take judicial notice of certain Michigan statutes. On cross appeal, defendants allege that the trial court erred in denying their motions for a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Moore Construction Co. v. Clarksville Department of ElectricityCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
- People v. DrossartMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Borman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Price v. Long Realty, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Paul v. BogleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Beaudrie v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Koenig v. City of South HavenMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Krass v. Tri-County Security, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- McCoy v. HatmakerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Oja v. KinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.