Ray v. Miller Meester Advertising, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYER, Justice.
In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether front pay is subject to multiplication under Minn.Stat. § 363.071, subd. 2 (2002).1
Appellant Miller Meester Advertising, Inc. (MMA), a Minnesota-based advertising agency, hired respondent Patricia Lu-dowese Ray in June of 1996 in the position of Vice President/Group Creative Director. At the time she was hired, Ray had 21 *406years of experience in the advertising industry. In June 1998, after two years of employment and without a negative performance evaluation, Ray was promoted to the position of Creative Director, the first…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pollard v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Lawrence J. Mathieu v. Gopher News CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Phelps v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- Cummings v. KoehnenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rodd Wagner v. Gallup, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Krueger v. Zeman Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Poehler v. Cincinnati Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Friend v. Gopher Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Noske v. FriedbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.