Legal Opinion

Johnson v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1924No. 18360PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPemberton, J.

This is an action by respondent to recover damages against the appellant for injuries sustained resulting from a collision between a street car owned by appellant and the automobile of respondent. The facts are more particularly set forth in the former appeal of this case found in Johnson v. Seattle, 113 Wash. 487, 194 Pac. 417. Judgment was entered upon the verdict of a jury in favor of respondent, from which judgment this appeal is taken.

*667Appellant states that:

í i There are only two questions in this ease, viz.: First, whether respondent is guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Snider v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Johnson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Thomas & Co. v. HillisWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Taylor v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. McGraw v. Manhattan Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. in Re 8650 Frisco, LLC D/B/A Estilo Gaucho Brazilian Steakhouse, Mandona, LLC, Galovelho, LLC, Bahtche, LLC, Claudio Nunes and David Jeiel Rodrigues, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API