Legal Opinion
Warren v. Goord
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 30, 2008No. 05 Civ. 9590 (RJH)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD J. HOLWELL, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Vincent Warren (“Plaintiff’) brings the instant action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants Glenn Goord and William Phillips (“Defendants”) for failure to protect him from harm from other inmates in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. Plaintiff asserts that Defendants’ failure to install metal detectors at the entrance to a recreation yard in Green Haven Correctional Facility (“Green Haven”) constituted deliberate indifference to the risk to inmates in this yard of violence from other inmates.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Perez v. PonteDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Grays v. McGrainDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2018
- Braxton v. BellDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2022
- Bright v. Irman Russo, AnnucciDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Doherty v. Suffolk County JailDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.