Legal Opinion

Koeplin v. Klotz

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 5, 2017No. Case No. 17-cv-01530-DMRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS’ FIRST AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM

Re: Dkt. No. 23

Donna M. Ryu, United States Magistrate Judge

This case arises under thé Employee Retirement Income' Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Plaintiff Linda' Koeplin filed this suit against Defendants Bayside Solutions Long-Term Incentive & 401(k) Restoration 'Plan and Robert Klotz, an. individual, asserting an ERISA claim for benefits. Defendants answered and counterclaimed against Koeplin. Koeplin now moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss1 Defendants’ first…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bemiss v. AlcazarDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  2. Crawford v. Guaranty State Bank & Trust Company, TheDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024
  3. Metaxas v. Gateway Bank F.S.B.District Court, N.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API