Legal Opinion

Bemiss v. Alcazar

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided October 25, 2024No. 2:23-cv-01481Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 John Bemiss, No. CV-23-01481-PHX-ROS 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Andrew Alcazar, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 This dispute arises out of Defendants’ alleged denial of benefits owed to Plaintiff 16 pursuant to a top hat plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 17 (“ERISA”). Plaintiff John Bemiss filed suit for equitable, injunctive, and monetary relief 18 against Defendants Russo and Steele LLC (“R&S LLC”), the Russo and Steele Phantom 19 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), and Andrew…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API