Legal Opinion
Weinberger v. Brumberg
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided August 12, 1905PublishedCited by 3 opinions
On motion to dismiss cross-bill.
1Opinion of the Court
Stevenson, Y. C.
The cross-bill of the defendant Abraham Einkelstein is filed to have the mortgage for $5,000 held by him given priority over the mortgage for $9,000 held by the defendant Emmanuel Heilner. Ileilner’s mortgage bears date January 27th, 1900, and was recorded January 29th, 1900. Einkelstein’s mortgage bears date September 26th, 1902, and was recorded on October 7th, 1902.
The facts set forth in the cross-bill upon which FinkelsteiiTs claim of priority is based are as follows:
The defendant Einkelstein, on September 26th, 1902, was the owner of the mortgaged premises, which are…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Curtis v. . MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Purdy v. . HuntingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wilson v. StevensNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
- Reinfeld v. Fidelity Union Trust Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
- Chemical Bank v. Penny Plate, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976