Legal Opinion

State v. Webb

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1977No. 11953PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERTZ, Circuit Judge.

Defendant was charged with unlawful distribution of a controlled substance on November 1,1975, and November 4,1975, in two separate indictments which were consolidated for trial.

The state’s case was dependent upon an informer’s testimony, since it was he who claimed to have made two separate purchases of a controlled drug from the defendant. The defendant did not testify, but did submit alibi testimony on the first purchase claimed by the state to have been made on November 1, 1975.

During recross-examination of one of defendant’s alibi witnesses, the state’s attorney…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ReddingtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State v. NormanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
  3. State v. BallardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State v. HanksSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  5. State v. MitchellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. DokkenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. MichalekSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. KiddSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. GageSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. ShullSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API