Legal Opinion
State v. Bromgard
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided September 11, 2003No. 27806PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZMAN, Judge Pro Tern.
Arthur Dell Bromgard appeals from his judgment of conviction after he conditionally pled guilty to trafficking in methamphetamine or amphetamine by manufacturing, reserving the right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress. Bromgard also appeals from the district court’s order denying his Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion for reduction of sentence. We affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
On the evening of January 18, 2001, officers were dispatched to a local store to check for Bromgard, who was wanted on a failure to appear arrest warrant. Dispatch had…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. AtkinsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. Valdez-MolinaIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BaxterIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. Lynn Lewis SchwabIdaho Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. SimantonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. DavisIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. GreerIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020