Legal Opinion
State v. Baxter
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided April 20, 2007No. 32597PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PERRY, Chief Judge.
Joseph Jackson Baxter appeals from his judgment of conviction for possession of a controlled substance and being a persistent violator. Specifically, Baxter challenges the district court’s order denying his pre-trial motion to suppress evidence. For the reasons set forth below, we vacate his judgment of conviction.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
Baxter was charged with possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine. I.C. § 37-2732(e). Baxter was also charged with being a persistent violator. I.C. § 19-2514. Baxter filed a motion to suppress the methamphetamine discovered in his…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BishopIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. LeeIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. LoeweIdaho Court of Appeals · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.