Legal Opinion
Sherman v. City of Colorado Springs Planning Commission
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided November 17, 1983No. 82CA0759PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TURSI, Judge.
Plaintiffs, land developers Marvin and Marie Sherman, appeal the district court’s order denying them relief from the rejection of their condominium development plan by the City Council of Colorado Springs (City). Approval of the development plan was a condition precedent to obtaining their desired building permit. Because we agree with the Shermans’ contentions that the City’s zoning ordinances were unconstitutionally applied and that mandamus relief is available to compel approval of their development plan, we reverse.
The Shermans have owned a 5.05 acre tract on the west side of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kozesnik v. Township of MontgomerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Snyder v. City of LakewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- Tri-State Generation & Transmission Co. v. City of ThorntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- City of Fort Collins v. DooneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
- City of Colorado Springs v. SmarttSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Colorado Springs v. SecurCare Self Storage, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Sherman v. City of Colorado Springs Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Sherman v. City of Colorado Springs Planning CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- Reynolds v. City Council of the City of LongmontColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
- Sherman v. COLORADO SPRINGS PLAN. COM'NSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.