Legal Opinion
Sherman v. COLORADO SPRINGS PLAN. COM'N
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided October 17, 1988No. 86SC306PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
763 P.2d 292 (1988)
Marvin SHERMAN and Marie Sherman, Petitioners,
v.
The CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS PLANNING COMMISSION and The City Council of the City of Colorado Springs, Respondents.
No. 86SC306.
Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.
October 17, 1988.
Rehearing Denied November 7, 1988.
Kane & Donley, Hayden W. Kane, Mark H. Kane, Colorado Springs, for petitioners.
James G. Colvin, II, City Atty., Jackson L. Smith, Asst. City Atty., Robert Mack, Asst. City Atty., Colorado Springs, for respondents.
ROVIRA, Justice.
Petitioners, Marvin and Marie Sherman, seek review of the court of appeals' decision in…
Also in this document: Dissent · Erickson; Dissent · Erickson.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Gramiger v. CrowleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Tri-State Generation & Transmission Co. v. City of ThorntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Cherry Hills Resort Development Co. v. City of Cherry Hills VillageSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Beaver Meadows v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Dillon Companies, Inc. v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cherry Hills Resort Development Co. v. City of Cherry Hills VillageSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- State ex rel. Norton v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- South Creek Associates v. Bixby & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989