Sherman v. City of Colorado Springs Planning Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ROVIRA, Justice.
Petitioners, Marvin and Marie Sherman, seek review of the court of appeals’ decision in Sherman v. Colorado Springs Planning Comm’n, 729 P.2d 1014 (Colo. App.1986), which held that they could not recover monetary damages for the wrongful denial of their development plan by the Planning Commission and City Council of Colorado Springs (City). We granted cer-tiorari in order to determine (1) whether the Shermans’ action was in the nature of mandamus, entitling them to monetary damages, or in the nature of certiorari, entitling them simply to a determination that the denial of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gramiger v. CrowleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Tri-State Generation & Transmission Co. v. City of ThorntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Cherry Hills Resort Development Co. v. City of Cherry Hills VillageSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Beaver Meadows v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Dillon Companies, Inc. v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Smith v. PlatiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- City of Colorado Springs v. SecurCare Self Storage, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Rocky Mountain Animal Defense v. Colorado Division of WildlifeColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- Widder v. Durango School District No. 9-RSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Verrier v. Colorado Department of CorrectionsColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.