Legal Opinion
Young v. Harris
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 13, 1981No. 80 Civ. 3276 (RJW)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
This is a civil rights action brought by a state prisoner pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff Timothy A. Young, who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed numerous “notices of motion” during the pendency of this action. After reviewing Young’s papers, the Court has determined to treat these notices of motion as (1) a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P.; (2) a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254; and (3) a motion to compel discovery pursuant to Rule 37, Fed.R.Civ.P. Defendants urge that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ronson v. Commissioner of CorrectionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Mirkin v. NotoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1982
- Kopec v. CoughlinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990