Legal Opinion
Mirkin v. Noto
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 13, 1982No. 79 Civ. 2589PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLASSER, District Judge:
The initial complaint in this action was filed on behalf of the members of the law firm of Mirkin, Barre, Saltzstein, Gordon, Hermann & Kreisberg, P. C. (“Mirkin Barre”), against various officials involved in the administration or investigation of the Suffolk County Civil Service Employees Association (“CSEA”) Welfare Fund and Legal Services Fund. Mirkin Barre had been retained by the CSEA Legal Services Fund to provide prepaid legal services to CSEA members, but was discharged after an investigation by a special committee of Suffolk County legislators found that the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Robert J. Fine v. The City of New York, Anthony SaladinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Elizabeth Forsling Harris v. Gloria Steinem, Patricia Carbine and Ms. Magazine Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sharp v. Kean UniversityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Rubinberg v. Hydronic Fabrications, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1991
- Scott v. Long Island Savings Bank, FSBCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- D'JAMOOS v. GriffithDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Frati v. PravednekowDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.