Legal Opinion

Biscoe v. Madden

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 15, 1856PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Writ of Error to Pojpe Cvrouit Cowrt. Hon. "Wm. H. Feild, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Soott

This case was brought here by writ of error to the Circuit Court of Pope county. The plaintiffs in error seek to reverse the judgment of that court, affirming in this case the judgment of the Probate Court of that county, refusing to allow, against the estate of James Madden, deceased, the claim in question. That claim, as appears from the bill of exceptions taken in the Probate Court, was founded upon a promissory note, which is here copied, and was sustained in the manner which we will then state in substance:

$1491 50. ---Couhtt, 1st day of Juk/, 1843,

On or before the 1st day of July, A. D.…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Alexander v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  2. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1861
  3. Union Cent. Life Ins. v. SkipperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  4. Ross v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
  5. Salinger v. BlackSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API