Legal Opinion

Ross v. Frick Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 12, 1904PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from St. Francis Chancery Court. Edward D. Robertson, Judge:

1Opinion of the CourtBattue, J.

The appellants have failed to file an abstract of the transcript in this case according to the rules of this court. The decree could be affirmed on account of such failure; but, as we have examined the transcript, we will dispose of it upon the record.

This suit was instituted by “The Frick Company” against Eucy M. Ross and the unknown heirs of John Ross, deceased, to foreclose a mortgage upon certain lands that was executed by John Ross ánd Eucy Ross, his wife, to secure the payment of five promissory notes. Plaintiff alleged that all of these notes have been paid except two, one of which was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mays v. RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1881
  2. Frierson v. BranchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1875
  3. Bennett v. Dawson adx.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1857
  4. Biscoe v. MaddenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1856
  5. Bennett v. DawsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1855

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. Franklin County Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  2. Mueller v. LightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  3. Bartel v. IngramSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  4. Williams v. MastersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  5. McGill v. HughesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API