Legal Opinion
AUSTINO v. CITY OF VINELAND
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 2, 2020No. 1:20-cv-01151Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ADAM AUSTINO : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : CITY OF VINELAND, et al. : NO. 20-1151 : MEMORANDUM Bartle, J. September 2, 2020 Plaintiff Adam Austino has sued defendants City of Vineland, as well as Anthony Fanucci, Gregory Pacitto, and the Policemen’s Benevolent Association, Local 266 (“PBA”) (“defendants”). Plaintiff alleges two separate claims for relief: (1) violation of his First Amendment rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; and (2) violation of the New Jersey Conscientious Employee Protection Act, N.J.S.A. § 34:19-1, et seq. (“CEPA”).…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sheridan v. NGK Metals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Michelle Tatis v. Allied Interstate LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Figueroa v. City of CamdenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.