Legal Opinion

Wilson Area School District v. Skepton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 2006No. 45 MAP 2005PublishedCited by 129 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

Chief Justice CAPPY.

This Court granted allowance of appeal limited to the issue of whether the Wilson Area School District (“School District” or “District”) is entitled to restitution of the permit fees refunded by Wilson Borough (“Borough”) to Franklin E. Skepton (“Skepton”), Joseph Bozzelli, trading as J.B. Plumbing Company (“J.B. Plumbing”), and Dual Temp Company, Inc. (“Dual Temp”) (collectively “Contractors”). The Com*516monwealth Court answered this question in the negative, and we affirm.

The facts underlying this matter are not in dispute and are…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Buffalo Township v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Schott v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Third National Bank & Trust Co. v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Binns v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Skepton v. Borough of WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by129 opinions

  1. American & Foreign Insurance v. Jerry's Sport Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Brown & Brown, Inc. v. ColaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Baker v. FAMILY CREDIT COUNSELING COPR.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Guy M. Cooper, Inc. v. East Penn School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Ecore Int'l, Inc. v. DowneyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018

124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API