Skepton v. Borough of Wilson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CAPPY, Justice.1
Franklin E. Skepton (“Skepton”), Joseph Bozzelli, Va J.B. Plumbing Company (“Bozzelli”) and Dual Temp. Co. Inc. (“Dual Temp”) (collectively, the “Contractors”) appeal from the order of the Commonwealth Court. The Commonwealth Court concluded that the Contractors were not entitled to a refund of construction permit fees paid to the Borough of Wilson (“Borough”) even though the ordinances and resolution pursuant to which the permit fees were collected were found *347to be unlawful and unenforceable. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the order of the Commonwealth Court.
Th…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Com., Dept. of Transp. v. BorosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Girard Trust Co. v. Philadelphia CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- JOHNSTON, INC. v. Com., Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Knarr v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Wilson Area School District v. SkeptonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. McMullenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Tech One Associates v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- In Re Estate of ScharlachSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- City of Philadelphia v. City of Philadelphia Tax Review Board ex rel. Keystone Health Plan East, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.