Legal Opinion

Skepton v. Borough of Wilson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 2000No. 230 M.D. Appeal Dkt.1999; 231 M.D. Appeal Docket, 1999PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAPPY, Justice.1

Franklin E. Skepton (“Skepton”), Joseph Bozzelli, Va J.B. Plumbing Company (“Bozzelli”) and Dual Temp. Co. Inc. (“Dual Temp”) (collectively, the “Contractors”) appeal from the order of the Commonwealth Court. The Commonwealth Court concluded that the Contractors were not entitled to a refund of construction permit fees paid to the Borough of Wilson (“Borough”) even though the ordinances and resolution pursuant to which the permit fees were collected were found *347to be unlawful and unenforceable. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the order of the Commonwealth Court.

Th…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Com., Dept. of Transp. v. BorosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Girard Trust Co. v. Philadelphia CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. JOHNSTON, INC. v. Com., Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Knarr v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Wilson Area School District v. SkeptonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. McMullenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Tech One Associates v. Board of Property Assessment, Appeals & ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. In Re Estate of ScharlachSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. City of Philadelphia v. City of Philadelphia Tax Review Board ex rel. Keystone Health Plan East, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API