Legal Opinion
Citizens State Bank of Hugo v. Hall
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 29, 1966No. 40698PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Justice.
After a receiver had been appointed to take possession of the assets of a depositor of the Citizens State Bank of Hugo, and other court proceedings were had, the bank appropriated certain funds which were on deposit to pay a note which the depositor owed the bank. The bank in appropriating said funds was allegedly exercising its rights under the “banker’s lien” statute, Title 42 O.S.1961, Sec. 32, which provides:
“A banker has a general lien, dependent on possession, upon all property in his hands belonging to a customer, for the balance due to him from such customer in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Woodrow v. EwingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Powell v. ChastainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Cherry v. GodardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Renegar v. StaplesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Ward v. AyresSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- A-Plus Janitorial & Carpet Cleaning v. the Employers' Workers' Compensation Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Jarrett v. GramlingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Woliansky v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- McDowell v. AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Jarrett v. GramlingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.