Legal Opinion
Jarrett v. Gramling
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 2, 1988No. 85-2861PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.8. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
I
Plaintiff, Lawrence R. Jarrett, was employed by defendant The City of Oklahoma City as a lieutenant in the Detective Division of the City’s Police Department, until he was terminated on April 26,1984, by the Chief of Police, defendant Lloyd A. Graml-ing. Plaintiff attempted to appeal his discharge…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- University of Tennessee v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Veiser v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Retherford v. Halliburton Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Comanche Indian Tribe Of Oklahoma v. HovisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Escobedo v. Davis (In re Escobedo)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Gates Learjet Corporation v. Duncan AviationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Santa Fe Village Venture v. City of AlbuquerqueDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1995
- Jarrett v. GramlingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.