Legal Opinion

Woliansky v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 17, 1983No. 2 CA-CIV 4265PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

In this lawsuit, appellant seeks specific performance of a contract to convey lot 16 in a subdivision known as Golden West Villas, or, in the alternative, damages for breach of contract. He also seeks damages due to the delayed conveyance of two other parcels of real property in the same development. The trial court, sitting without a jury, denied specific performance of the contract for sale of lot 16 and refused to award the appellant damages due to appellee’s delayed conveyance of the two other lots.

On July 14, 1978, appellant Woliansky contracted to buy three lots…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McFarlin v. HallArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Gilmore v. CohenArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Sabin v. RauchArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Citizens State Bank of Hugo v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  5. Ensign v. BohnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. Wood v. SimonsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Hinkle v. WineyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Woliansky v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. Blackmore v. HonnasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API