Legal Opinion
Randolph v. Bath & Body Works, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided June 18, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00284Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Devin Randolph, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:25-cv-284 vV. Judge Michael H. Watson Bath & Body Works, Inc., ef a/., Magistrate Judge Deavers Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Devin Randolph (‘Plaintiff’) proceeds without counsel and without the prepayment of fees. ECF No. 5. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), the Magistrate Judge performed an initial screen of Plaintiff's Complaint and ultimately issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending the Court dismiss the same. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff objects. ECF No. 8. For the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Vickey Searcy, of the Estate of Lawrence Eugene Hileman, and Jerry L. Smith v. City of Dayton and James E. Newby, Roger W. Waller and Dennis MichaelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Karen Balas v. Huntington Ingalls IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Bryson v. Regis Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FRANK’S NURSERY & CRAFTS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Franceschi v. United States Department of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.