Legal Opinion

Pane v. Department of Highways

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1966No. Appeal, 279PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

This appeal presents an interesting question: is the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in the absence of an actual “taking” of property, liable for consequential damages where a plan for the widening and change of grade of a highway was duly filed prior to the passage of the Eminent Domain Code of 1964 1 (the Code), but where the actual widening of said highway and the change of grade, — as the result of which a property abutting the highway sustained damages — was not undertaken until after the effective date of the Code?

Eor approximately 18 years, Philip Pane and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Rieck Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Cali v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Creighan v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Jones & Laughlin Tax Assessment CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Commonwealth v. ScoleriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Atcovitz v. Gulph Mills Tennis Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Gehris v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Ken R. on Behalf of CR v. ARTHUR Z.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Lenau, N. v. Co-Exprise, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Benjamin & Fannie Kellman Trust Fund, Dart Supply, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API