Pane v. Department of Highways
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Jones,
This appeal presents an interesting question: is the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in the absence of an actual “taking” of property, liable for consequential damages where a plan for the widening and change of grade of a highway was duly filed prior to the passage of the Eminent Domain Code of 1964 1 (the Code), but where the actual widening of said highway and the change of grade, — as the result of which a property abutting the highway sustained damages — was not undertaken until after the effective date of the Code?
Eor approximately 18 years, Philip Pane and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Rieck Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Cali v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Creighan v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Jones & Laughlin Tax Assessment CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Commonwealth v. ScoleriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Atcovitz v. Gulph Mills Tennis Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Gehris v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Ken R. on Behalf of CR v. ARTHUR Z.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Lenau, N. v. Co-Exprise, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Benjamin & Fannie Kellman Trust Fund, Dart Supply, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.