Legal Opinion

Lenau, N. v. Co-Exprise, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 23, 2014No. 780 WDA 2013PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

WECHT, J.:

In this case involving subsurface mineral rights, Nancy M. Lenau, Daniel T. Lenau, and Kathleen Trishock (collectively, “Appellants”), appeal from the May 1, 2013 order that sustained the preliminary objections of CoeXprise, Inc. (“Co-eXprise”), and dismissed the Appellants’ complaint. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

The trial court summarized the factual history of this case as follows:

This litigation arises out of the conduct of [Co-eXprise], which, acting as an intermediary, encouraged property owners in Beaver County, Pennsylvania to pool their interests by…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Landreth Timber Co. v. LandrethSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Hutchison v. Sunbeam Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Northwest Savings v. Knapp, B. v. Travel ServicesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. SBA Towers v. Wireless HoldingsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Walney v. SWEPI LPDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. SBA Towers v. Wireless HoldingsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Coryell, C. v. Morris, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API