Legal Opinion

Hoovestol v. Security State Bank

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1992No. Civ. 910084PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Justice.

Security State Bank of New Salem (the Bank) has appealed from an amended district court judgment in favor of Darlene Hoovestol and Gregory Hoovestol, Personal Representative of the Glenn Hoovestol Estate (hereinafter collectively referred to as Hoovestol), and from an order denying the Bank’s motion for j.n.o.v. or new trial. Hoovestol cross-appealed. We affirm.

Throughout their marriage, Glenn and Darlene Hoovestol were loan customers of the Bank. When they executed notes, Glenn and Darlene took credit life insurance provided through the Bank. When Glenn died on January…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Andrews v. O'HEARNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Okken v. OkkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Keyes v. AmundsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Witthauer v. Burkhart Roentgen, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Kerzmann v. RohwederNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nelson v. WEB Water Development Ass'n, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. McCullar v. UNIV. UNDERWRITERS LIFE INS.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  3. Wolf v. Estate of SerightNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. HidanovicNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Ceartin v. OchsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API