Legal Opinion
Kerzmann v. Rohweder
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 10, 1982No. Civ. 10141, Civ. 10168PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Justice.
Ray Rohweder and Darrel Rausch appealed from the order of the district court, McIntosh County, denying a motion for a new trial. Rohweder and Rausch [hereinafter referred to as “Rohweder”] moved for a new trial after judgment had been entered against them pursuant to a jury verdict. The basis of their motion was an affidavit signed by all the jurors that the jury’s answers to questions on. a special-verdict form did not reflect its true verdict. We affirm.
The action against Rohweder was based upon misrepresentation in the sale of livestock to Dale Kerzmann. The jury…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Woodward v. LeavittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- People v. HutchinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Commonwealth v. FidlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Wright v. Illinois & Mississippi Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1866
- Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Andrews v. O'HEARNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Mauch v. Manufacturers Sales & Service, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Keyes v. AmundsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Minto Grain, LLC v. TibertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. HidanovicNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.