People v. Wagner
Michigan Supreme Court
Certiorari to recorder’s court of Detroit. (Chambers, J.) Defendants were convicted of a violation of an ordinance of the city of Detroit providing a uniform weight of a loaf of bread. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
These cases come from the recorder’s court of the city of Detroit by writ of certiorari, defendants having been convicted 'of a violation of a city ordinance. By stipulation, the cases come up on one record.
Defendants are bakers, and are charged with making for sale, selling, and offering for sale bread that was ■deficient in weight under the ordinance.
The ordinance is entitled, “An ordinance relative to the manufacture and sale of bread.” The ordinance provides1 that it shall not be lawful for any person to carry on the trade or business of baker without first having obtained from the common…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. HanrahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Eaton v. KeganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
3Cited by29 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Davis v. RoseSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Melconian v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- City of Chicago v. Bowman Dairy Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
- City of Chicago v. SchmidingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. BrazeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.