Farrow v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
WEANT, Judge.
Parker Farrow, appellant, was convicted by a Montgomery County jury of robbery with a deadly weapon and of use of a handgun in the commission of a felony. On appeal, Farrow contends that the trial court erred in denying defense motions to suppress statements and tangible evidence. This is not precisely the case. Farrow’s motions were heard and denied by a motions judge in a pre-trial suppression hearing; review of that ruling is properly before us under Md. Rule 4-252(g)(2), and we, like the motions judge, shall assume Farrow’s standing to object to the search of the automobile…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Longshore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Trott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Cross v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.