Legal Opinion

Farrow v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 5, 1986No. 1380, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEANT, Judge.

Parker Farrow, appellant, was convicted by a Montgomery County jury of robbery with a deadly weapon and of use of a handgun in the commission of a felony. On appeal, Farrow contends that the trial court erred in denying defense motions to suppress statements and tangible evidence. This is not precisely the case. Farrow’s motions were heard and denied by a motions judge in a pre-trial suppression hearing; review of that ruling is properly before us under Md. Rule 4-252(g)(2), and we, like the motions judge, shall assume Farrow’s standing to object to the search of the automobile…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Longshore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Trott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. Cross v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API